Cosmetic Efficacy Evaluation of Veritace-Tested LED Technology (Report QDCPCH24000497-02_EN-V2)
Source read by Luma Index (results not verified)Studied: This exact mask Not peer-reviewed
Single-group, open, before-vs-after (no control or sham group; no blinding stated) · 35 participants
What it measured and its limits
Measured: Instrumental hydration, elasticity, firmness, wrinkle volume (Primos), tone/redness (VISIA), sebum, expert and self-assessment at D14/28/42/56; reported as significant vs baseline (p<0.05)
- No control or sham group, so changes cannot be separated from placebo, season or skincare changes
- Commissioned cosmetic-claims test, not peer-reviewed
- Small sample; mostly women; one population
- Use frequency in the study exceeds the recommended consumer frequency